Re: please consider dak and nautilus-python for testing

2007-01-21 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, (Cc:-ed debian-dak list for information) On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 05:36:26PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 03:43:53PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > Steve Langasek wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 07:44:47PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > >>> Hmm, there's nothing

Re: please consider dak and nautilus-python for testing

2007-01-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 09:03:17PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > two NMUs, the packages are currently not in testing; no RC reports for > unstable: > dak (1.0-8.2) unstable; urgency=medium >* NMU >* Remove build dependency on versioned python version with an unversioned. > Closes:

Re: please consider dak and nautilus-python for testing

2007-01-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 03:43:53PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 07:44:47PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > >>> Hmm, there's nothing particularly important about the dak package shipped > >>> in > >>> Debian, it's not used on Debian infrastructure.

Re: please consider dak and nautilus-python for testing

2007-01-20 Thread Luk Claes
Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 07:44:47PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: >>> Hmm, there's nothing particularly important about the dak package shipped in >>> Debian, it's not used on Debian infrastructure. > >> OK, fine then. > >> Would you guys prefer /me to wait for dak 1.0-8.

Re: please consider dak and nautilus-python for testing

2007-01-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 07:44:47PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Hmm, there's nothing particularly important about the dak package shipped in > > Debian, it's not used on Debian infrastructure. > OK, fine then. > Would you guys prefer /me to wait for dak 1.0-8.2 to enter testing > after you

Re: please consider dak and nautilus-python for testing

2007-01-19 Thread Christian Perrier
> Hmm, there's nothing particularly important about the dak package shipped in > Debian, it's not used on Debian infrastructure. OK, fine then. Would you guys prefer /me to wait for dak 1.0-8.2 to enter testing after you hint it or should I just upload my 1.0-8.3 l10n NMU? signature.asc Descr

Re: please consider dak and nautilus-python for testing

2007-01-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:25:04PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > two NMUs, the packages are currently not in testing; no RC reports for > > unstable: > > dak (1.0-8.2) unstable; urgency=medium > >* NMU > >* Remove build dependency on v

Re: please consider dak and nautilus-python for testing

2007-01-17 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > two NMUs, the packages are currently not in testing; no RC reports for > unstable: > > dak (1.0-8.2) unstable; urgency=medium > >* NMU >* Remove build dependency on versioned python version with an unversioned. > Closes: #403357. >*

please consider dak and nautilus-python for testing

2007-01-17 Thread Matthias Klose
two NMUs, the packages are currently not in testing; no RC reports for unstable: dak (1.0-8.2) unstable; urgency=medium * NMU * Remove build dependency on versioned python version with an unversioned. Closes: #403357. * Convert to updated python policy, using python-central. Close