Re: please binNMU monotone for botan transition

2009-07-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Adeodato Simó (07/05/2009): > I won't be scheduling Bin-NMUs of either package until that has > happened. JFTR, that happened, and I've just NMU'd keysafe, so there should be no need for binNMUs. It couldn't build anyway, due to the boost changes (see #530466). Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Descri

Re: please binNMU monotone for botan transition

2009-05-07 Thread Zack Weinberg
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > monotone and keysafe certainly need to be rebuilt against the new > version of botan, since the SONAME has changed. However, the libbotan1.8 > binary package name should have been renamed in the process of bumping > the SONAME (Bug#527461),

Re: please binNMU monotone for botan transition

2009-05-07 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Zack Weinberg (Wed, 06 May 2009 12:55:20 -0700): Hello, Zack (and keysafe maintainers). > Hi, per the appended bug report, monotone needs to be recompiled to > pick up the new libbotan soname. Please schedule: > nmu monotone_0.43-3 . ALL . -m "Recompile with botan-devel 1.8.2" > dw monoto

please binNMU monotone for botan transition (Fwd: [Monotone-debian] Bug#527314: monotone: Monotone needs recompile against libbotan 1.8.2)

2009-05-06 Thread Zack Weinberg
Hi, per the appended bug report, monotone needs to be recompiled to pick up the new libbotan soname. Please schedule: nmu monotone_0.43-3 . ALL . -m "Recompile with botan-devel 1.8.2" dw monotone_0.43-3 . ia64 mips mipsel sparc . -m 'libbotan1.8-dev (>= 1.8.2-1)' This closes bug #527314. I