Re: please binNMU liblrdf

2006-03-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 01:00:19AM +0100, Robert Jordens wrote: > On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 15:43 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > This looks like a bug either in libcurl3, or in the maintainer's build of > > libraptor1 on his system -- some version of libcurl3 defined these versioned > > symbols, but

Re: please binNMU liblrdf

2006-03-04 Thread Robert Jordens
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 15:43 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > This looks like a bug either in libcurl3, or in the maintainer's build of > libraptor1 on his system -- some version of libcurl3 defined these versioned > symbols, but the current Debian package does not, which means the ABI of the > libcur

Re: please binNMU liblrdf

2006-03-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 08:16:22PM +0100, Robert Jordens wrote: > Could you trigger a binNMU of liblrdf on all arches? It is build against > libssl 0.9.7 (caused by libraptor pulling in that dependency). > Having part of the libraries link against libssl 0.9.7 and others > against 0.9.8 causes fu

please binNMU liblrdf

2006-03-04 Thread Robert Jordens
Hi, Could you trigger a binNMU of liblrdf on all arches? It is build against libssl 0.9.7 (caused by libraptor pulling in that dependency). Having part of the libraries link against libssl 0.9.7 and others against 0.9.8 causes funny stuff like this: /usr/bin/ld: warning: libssl.so.0.9.7, needed