[Filip Hanes]
> Hi,
> I'm new maintainer of casparcg-server after pere.
And I am very happy to have a replacement who actually use the
package. :) The package is also moved under the Debian Multimedia
umbrella, allowing more people to particiate. :)
>> 1) Chromium adds a chromium-source binary p
Hi,
I'm new maintainer of casparcg-server after pere.
> 1) Chromium adds a chromium-source binary package, with the understanding
> that whoever packages CEF will keep it out of stable
Could we try this option 1) to make some progress at least in unstable and
testing
and later with more experie
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 23:00:23 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Moritz_M=C3=BChlenhoff?= wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:41:25PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > Ultimately this is up for Michael to decide, as he's dealing with
Chro
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:41:25PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Ultimately this is up for Michael to decide, as he's dealing with Chromium
> > updates single-handedly.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > Personally I have no reservatio
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:33:11PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Ultimately this is up for Michael to decide, as he's dealing with Chromium
> updates single-handedly.
Agreed.
> Personally I have no reservations against this entering unstable, but this
> doesn't sound
> like something that s
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:00:24AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Michael Gilbert wrote:
>
> > Major updates to chromium in stable have so far been contingent on it
> > being a leaf package, where there is no chance for it to break
> > any
Hi,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Major updates to chromium in stable have so far been contingent on it
> being a leaf package, where there is no chance for it to break
> anything else. Adding CEF as a reverse dependency would change that.
^^
> On 15/1
On 15/10/2018 19:19, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 12:29:15PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 12:17:21AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Major updates to chromium in stable have so far been contingent on it
being a leaf package, whe
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 12:29:15PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 12:17:21AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>>> Major updates to chromium in stable have so far been contingent on it
>>> being a leaf package, where there is no chance for it to break
>>> anything els
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 12:17:21AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>> Major updates to chromium in stable have so far been contingent on it
>> being a leaf package, where there is no chance for it to break
>> anything else. Adding CEF as a reverse dependency would change that.
>>
>> This is mo
10 matches
Mail list logo
