Re: please accept NMU of gkrellm

2005-05-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 07:20:52PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > >On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 05:09:58PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote: > >>I've just made an NMU for gkrellm to close the RC-bug #309089. I've only > >>added a patch to make gkrellm use gnutls instead of (GPL-incomp

Re: please accept NMU of gkrellm

2005-05-22 Thread Samuel Mimram
Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 05:09:58PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote: I've just made an NMU for gkrellm to close the RC-bug #309089. I've only added a patch to make gkrellm use gnutls instead of (GPL-incompatible) openssl. I've been able to get my mail count (it's the only use o

Re: please accept NMU of gkrellm

2005-05-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 05:09:58PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote: > I've just made an NMU for gkrellm to close the RC-bug #309089. I've only > added a patch to make gkrellm use gnutls instead of (GPL-incompatible) > openssl. > I've been able to get my mail count (it's the only use of ssl in > gkrel

please accept NMU of gkrellm

2005-05-22 Thread Samuel Mimram
Hi, I've just made an NMU for gkrellm to close the RC-bug #309089. I've only added a patch to make gkrellm use gnutls instead of (GPL-incompatible) openssl. I've been able to get my mail count (it's the only use of ssl in gkrellm) over imaps and some people told me that they have been able to