On moandei 26 Jannewaris 2009, sean finney wrote:
> i just did another upload. i guess i don't get the accept/reject
> notifications for these, so let me know if there's any more problems.
It arrived and is building now.
Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
hiya,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:33:16AM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> It was rejected:
> php5_5.2.6.dfsg.1-1+lenny2_amd64.changes
> REJECT
> Rejected: php5_5.2.6.dfsg.1-1+lenny2.dsc refers to
> php5_5.2.6.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it in the queue or in the
> pool.
> Rejecting.
>
> Plea
Hi,
* sean finney [2009-01-26 09:17]:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 06:46:18PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > I don't see any reason why it can't go via testing-security personally.
> > Note that currently testing-security uploads reach tpu automatically and
> > are processed by the Release Team to get i
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 06:46:18PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> I don't see any reason why it can't go via testing-security personally.
> Note that currently testing-security uploads reach tpu automatically and
> are processed by the Release Team to get it into lenny proper.
okay, this i didn't know
sean finney wrote:
> hi everyone,
Hi
> excuse the cross-posting, i just want to make sure everyone's on the
> same page for what should be next for php5 -> lenny
Ok, though I don't think it's that controversial :-)
> someone suggested to look at using testing-security as a path to lenny for
> t
hi everyone,
excuse the cross-posting, i just want to make sure everyone's on the
same page for what should be next for php5 -> lenny
quick recap:
when we last left off[1] Raphael was seeking pre-approval of a
lenny-targeted upload of php5. because of library dependency changes,
this needed to
6 matches
Mail list logo
