Re: perl 5.18 progress

2013-05-20 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 09:22:20AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2013-05-20 08:57, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Niels Thykier writes: > >> On 2013-05-20 01:54, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > >>> Be aware that Perl 5.18.0 includes podlators 2.5.1, which means that > >>> pod2man now exits with an error by

Re: perl 5.18 progress

2013-05-20 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-05-20 08:57, Russ Allbery wrote: > Niels Thykier writes: >> On 2013-05-20 01:54, Russ Allbery wrote: > >>> Be aware that Perl 5.18.0 includes podlators 2.5.1, which means that >>> pod2man now exits with an error by default if there are POD syntax >>> errors. I believe this means that som

Re: perl 5.18 progress

2013-05-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Niels Thykier writes: > On 2013-05-20 01:54, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Be aware that Perl 5.18.0 includes podlators 2.5.1, which means that >> pod2man now exits with an error by default if there are POD syntax >> errors. I believe this means that some fairly large percentage of the >> packages with

Re: perl 5.18 progress

2013-05-19 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-05-20 01:54, Russ Allbery wrote: > Dominic Hargreaves writes: > >> perl 5.18.0 was released today, and we're already well on the way to >> having it ready for upload to sid. However, it might be a month or more >> before it's ready from our end. Would you prefer to have a transition >> bu

Re: perl 5.18 progress

2013-05-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Dominic Hargreaves writes: > perl 5.18.0 was released today, and we're already well on the way to > having it ready for upload to sid. However, it might be a month or more > before it's ready from our end. Would you prefer to have a transition > bug opened now, before our schedule become clear, o

Re: perl 5.18 progress

2013-05-19 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 03:47:02PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:49:50PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > I guess we're not quite in a position to estimate when a perl 5.18 might > > happen, but it is probably worth talking about when we want to file > > a transition b