On 2014-08-18 16:57, Ross Gammon wrote:
> On 08/10/2014 10:58 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> * You bump #748386 to serious (or have it fixed).
>
> Thanks to Tobias Frost's sponsorship, a NMU has fixed this (remove
> osm-gps-map as a B-D). I have just been waiting for subsurface to
> m
On 08/10/2014 10:58 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
[...]
> It is possible to make osm-gps-map a valid candidate, which would make
> it possible for it to migrate. But what is needed is not an "unblock",
> instead you need "decruft".
>
> Your package is basically in middle of a transition; but since i
On 08/10/2014 10:58 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2014-08-10 20:38, Ross Gammon wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>
[...]
>
> The process from here
> =
>
> *In the particular case*, here is how I suggest we handle this:
>
> * You bump #748386 to serious (or have it fixed).
I will get on
On 2014-08-10 20:38, Ross Gammon wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi Ross,
Thanks for taking your time reviewing and following up on a stuck
testing migration. In particular, thanks for also looking at the reverse
dependencies of your package.
> [...]
>
> Would it be possible to unblock osmgpsmap?
>
> As I am
Hi,
Osmgpsmap has been stuck in testing since 2014-01-27. The two
dependencies creepy and gpxviewer have already been removed from testing
some time ago.
I have contacted the gpxviewer maintainer, and he is working on getting
gpxviewer uploaded again using the new gir1.2-osmgpsmap-1.0 instead of
5 matches
Mail list logo
