Re: ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-03-05 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 22:40 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 16:28:25 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:42 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:05:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > > > > > Ready to transition: mumps,

Re: ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-03-05 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 17:03:51 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Oh dear. Do we need to do this for every reverse-depends package in > order for the whole thing to transition? > Yes. If you have a list of debs a single bug probably works though. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Dig

Re: ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-03-05 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 16:28:25 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:42 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:05:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > > > Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc, hdf5 -- not sure why these > > > didn't go into testin

Re: ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-02-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:05:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc, hdf5 -- not sure why these > didn't go into testing this past weekend, they should all be ready. > mumps and hdf5 have now transitioned. For petsc/slepc, they either need to build again on

Re: ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-02-14 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 12:15 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Adam C Powell IV (13/02/2012): > > Writing in with an update: > > Thanks. > > > Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc, hdf5 -- not sure why these > > didn't go into testing this past weekend, they should all be ready. > > Not quite:

Re: ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-02-14 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le mardi 14 février 2012 à 12:15 +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > Adam C Powell IV (13/02/2012): > > Writing in with an update: > > Thanks. > > > Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc, hdf5 -- not sure why these > > didn't go into testing this past weekend, they should all be ready. > > No

Re: ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-02-14 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Adam C Powell IV (13/02/2012): > Writing in with an update: Thanks. > Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc, hdf5 -- not sure why these > didn't go into testing this past weekend, they should all be ready. Not quite: http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/hdf5.html http://release.deb

Re: ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-02-13 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Writing in with an update: On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 14:59 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Adam C Powell IV (26/01/2012): > > On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 00:51 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > That means one “OK-able” package, one “oops-broken-for-a-long-while” > > > package, and several “unknown-status

Re: ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-01-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Adam C Powell IV (26/01/2012): > On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 00:51 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > That means one “OK-able” package, one “oops-broken-for-a-long-while” > > package, and several “unknown-status” packages. To keep everyone as > > testing candidates until this transition is ready, maybe r

Re: ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-01-26 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 00:51 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Adam C Powell IV (23/01/2012): > > deal.II detects the PETSc version and acts accordingly, I believe 7.1.0 > > will work through 3.2. I need to work on upgrading from 7.0.0 to 7.1.0. > > […] > > > Illuminator has major problems -- the

Re: ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-01-23 Thread Johannes Ring
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Can't speak for the others (dolfin, feel++, gmsh). DOLFIN 1.0.0 works with PETSc/SLEPc 3.2, only minor changes are needed in the Debian files. I can make a new upload soon. Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@

Re: ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-01-23 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Adam C Powell IV (23/01/2012): > deal.II detects the PETSc version and acts accordingly, I believe 7.1.0 > will work through 3.2. I need to work on upgrading from 7.0.0 to 7.1.0. […] > Illuminator has major problems -- the PETSc object on which all of > illuminator is based has changed drastica

Re: ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-01-23 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hello Julian, On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 16:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, > > it seems there's currently a move from petsc and slepc 3.1 to 3.2 in > sid. In addition to the library package names changing, presumably > because the new versions are not binary-compatible, the devel package > wer

ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-01-21 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi, it seems there's currently a move from petsc and slepc 3.1 to 3.2 in sid. In addition to the library package names changing, presumably because the new versions are not binary-compatible, the devel package were also renamed, from libpetsc3.1-dev and libslepc3.1-dev to libpetsc3.2-dev and libs