Re: [buildd-tools-devel] octave3.2 autobuild problems

2009-07-21 Thread Thomas Weber
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 07:10:41PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:26:43PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:04:24PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:53:19PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: > > > > > correct. It might have something

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] octave3.2 autobuild problems

2009-07-21 Thread Roger Leigh
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:26:43PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:04:24PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:53:19PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: > > > > correct. It might have something to do with what packages have been > > > > unpacked > > > > before

Re: octave3.2 autobuild problems

2009-07-21 Thread Riku Voipio
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:04:24PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:53:19PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: > > > correct. It might have something to do with what packages have been > > > unpacked > > > before octave 3.2 postinst is run. > > Can you make the build log(s) availabl

Re: octave3.2 autobuild problems

2009-07-21 Thread Riku Voipio
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:53:19PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: > > correct. It might have something to do with what packages have been unpacked > > before octave 3.2 postinst is run. > Can you make the build log(s) available up until the hang (I assume there > is such a thing, but I'm not familiar

Re: octave3.2 autobuild problems

2009-07-21 Thread Thomas Weber
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 09:46:59AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:03:04AM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:41:42AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > > the armel experimental buildd is again having hangings like #524745 > > > in octave3.2 postinst. Seen s

Re: octave3.2 autobuild problems

2009-07-20 Thread Riku Voipio
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:03:04AM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:41:42AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > the armel experimental buildd is again having hangings like #524745 > > in octave3.2 postinst. Seen so far with: > > octave-audio octave-ad octave-combinatorics octave-f

Re: octave3.2 autobuild problems

2009-07-20 Thread Thomas Weber
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:41:42AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:49:34PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > The octave3.2 package failed to autobuild on ia64 and is stuck on > > powerpc. > > the armel experimental buildd is again having hangings like #524745 > in octave

Re: octave3.2 autobuild problems

2009-07-20 Thread Riku Voipio
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:49:34PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > The octave3.2 package failed to autobuild on ia64 and is stuck on > powerpc. the armel experimental buildd is again having hangings like #524745 in octave3.2 postinst. Seen so far with: octave-audio octave-ad octave-combinator

Re: octave3.2 autobuild problems

2009-06-19 Thread LaMont Jones
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:49:34PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > The failure on caballero is due to the infamous alternatives problem [2] but > nobody seem to care. I wish I could ask for this: > 2: http://lists.debian.org/debian-wb-team/2009/06/msg00058.html I'll go fix caballero tonight -

Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] octave3.2 autobuild problems

2009-06-19 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Kurt Roeckx [2009-06-19 23:48]: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:49:34PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > The octave3.2 package failed to autobuild on ia64 and is stuck on > > powerpc. This is blocking our planned transition of the octave-forge > > packages from octave3.0 to octave3.2 [1]. > >

Re: octave3.2 autobuild problems

2009-06-19 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:49:34PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > The octave3.2 package failed to autobuild on ia64 and is stuck on > powerpc. This is blocking our planned transition of the octave-forge > packages from octave3.0 to octave3.2 [1]. > > The failure on caballero is due to the inf

octave3.2 autobuild problems

2009-06-19 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
The octave3.2 package failed to autobuild on ia64 and is stuck on powerpc. This is blocking our planned transition of the octave-forge packages from octave3.0 to octave3.2 [1]. The failure on caballero is due to the infamous alternatives problem [2] but nobody seem to care. I wish I could ask fo