On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 11:20:58AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-11 20:43]:
> > > Thanks for the clarification. It happens that I am the maintainer of
> > > plplot. I will try to fix Bug #361781 ASAP. Should I set
> > > "urgency=high"?
> > Tha
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-11 20:43]:
> > Thanks for the clarification. It happens that I am the maintainer of
> > plplot. I will try to fix Bug #361781 ASAP. Should I set
> > "urgency=high"?
>
> That would be best, yes.
I am confused now. The hdf5 transition seems to be c
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-10 20:15]:
> > It's been held up by packages which are not binNMU-safe: pytables and
> > plplot. Bug #361781 has been filed for the issue in plplot, and I'm about
> > to sponsor a m
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-10 20:15]:
> It's been held up by packages which are not binNMU-safe: pytables and
> plplot. Bug #361781 has been filed for the issue in plplot, and I'm about
> to sponsor a maintainer upload for the pytables issue.
Thanks for the clarification. It
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 01:39:37PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-04 13:02]:
> > It looks like the hdf5 transition should be ready to go in the next day or
> > two, btw, so please hold off on any more comedically erroneous uploads for
> > now. :)
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-04 13:02]:
> It looks like the hdf5 transition should be ready to go in the next day or
> two, btw, so please hold off on any more comedically erroneous uploads for
> now. :)
It has been six days since the message above and I do not see the
packages i
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 11:42:02AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> Some days ago, I mistakenly uploaded version 2.1.73-1 to unstable,
> delaying the transition of libhdf5 1.67.5 into testing. In a cumulation
> of errors, we noticed yesterday that this version was built against
> libhdf5 1.6.4.
Some days ago, I mistakenly uploaded version 2.1.73-1 to unstable,
delaying the transition of libhdf5 1.67.5 into testing. In a cumulation
of errors, we noticed yesterday that this version was built against
libhdf5 1.6.4. The fixed version 2.1.73-2 is now in incoming. I deeply
apologize for this
8 matches
Mail list logo
