Re: nsis binNMU

* Paul Wise [Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:00:09 +0800]: > > Hello Paul. I'd be much more happier if you could modify the packaging > > so that the build fails if makensis was not built (hm, I see you don't > > use dh_install; the normal way to do it is listing all binaries in the > > .install file...) > >

Re: nsis binNMU

On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Paul. I'd be much more happier if you could modify the packaging > so that the build fails if makensis was not built (hm, I see you don't > use dh_install; the normal way to do it is listing all binaries in the > .ins

Re: nsis binNMU

* Paul Wise [Sun, 08 Jun 2008 13:21:50 +0800]: > I'm not able to reproduce #484938 (makensis not being built on amd64) > after a rebuild on pergolesi, nor my laptop. However, the buildd log > for amd64 clearly shows that the binary is not being produced and the > tests not run. I'm hoping that a b

nsis binNMU

Hi all, I'm not able to reproduce #484938 (makensis not being built on amd64) after a rebuild on pergolesi, nor my laptop. However, the buildd log for amd64 clearly shows that the binary is not being produced and the tests not run. I'm hoping that a binNMU will be enough to fix this issue, could t