On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:15:12PM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> I wrote to the admin list to see if we could get a woody chroot on lully,
> but I haven't heard a responce on this at all yet (over two weeks
> now...and my message also stated that lully needed a kernel change due to
> rand
Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:15:12PM -0400 wrote:
>
> On 1 Jun 2001, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> > Nobody is working on Alpha boot floppies for Woody at the moment.
> > This is a bad situation. Unless alpha porters start working on
> > getting things going for their architecture, won't that mean we don'
On 1 Jun 2001, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Nobody is working on Alpha boot floppies for Woody at the moment.
> This is a bad situation. Unless alpha porters start working on
> getting things going for their architecture, won't that mean we don't
> have boot-floppies and Alpha will not be able to part
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> >
> > Nobody is working on Alpha boot floppies for Woody at the moment.
> > This is a bad situation. Unless alpha porters start working on
> > getting things going for their architecture, won't that mean we don't
> > have boot-f
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Nobody is working on Alpha boot floppies for Woody at the moment.
> This is a bad situation. Unless alpha porters start working on
> getting things going for their architecture, won't that mean we don't
> have boot-floppies and Alpha will not be able to participate in the
Nobody is working on Alpha boot floppies for Woody at the moment.
This is a bad situation. Unless alpha porters start working on
getting things going for their architecture, won't that mean we don't
have boot-floppies and Alpha will not be able to participate in the
Woody release?
--
.Adam
6 matches
Mail list logo
