Re: nano update request

2007-01-10 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 12:46, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > I have reviewed it and think it's fine. I would like to have Frans > approval, as nano has a udeb, though. No objection. pgpd6C03ulOVc.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: nano update request

2007-01-10 Thread Jordi Mallach
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 12:46:46PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > > If approving 2.0.2-1 is possible, this is my prefered option, obviously. > > The diff is "big", but excluding comments and docs, it's not that scary. > I have reviewed it and think it's fine. I would like to have Frans > ap

Re: nano update request

2007-01-10 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 02:41:26AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: >>> translation updates. There's a segfault and memleak fixes in CVS that I >>> can apply to 2.0.1 and upload to unstable if there's chances of getting >>> it accepted in etch. If not, I'll j

Re: nano update request

2007-01-10 Thread Jordi Mallach
Hey vorlon, On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 02:41:26AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > translation updates. There's a segfault and memleak fixes in CVS that I > > can apply to 2.0.1 and upload to unstable if there's chances of getting > > it accepted in etch. If not, I'll just wait for 2.0.2, not targett

Re: nano update request

2006-12-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 07:59:21PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote: > I uploaded nano 2.0.1 a while ago to unstable which had minor code > changes for the bugs that cropped up in 2.0. Also, there was a number of > translation updates. There's a segfault and memleak fixes in CVS that I > can apply to 2.0

Re: nano update request

2006-12-18 Thread Jordi Mallach
Hi aba, On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:53:41AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > what does that mean? the current version in unstable should be accepted? > (and you want to upload a new version afterwards?) Or you want to do a > new upload to unstable and get the result accepted? No, a new upload not yet

Re: nano update request

2006-12-18 Thread Andreas Barth
* Jordi Mallach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061217 19:59]: > I uploaded nano 2.0.1 a while ago to unstable which had minor code > changes for the bugs that cropped up in 2.0. Also, there was a number of > translation updates. There's a segfault and memleak fixes in CVS that I > can apply to 2.0.1 and uplo

nano update request

2006-12-17 Thread Jordi Mallach
Hey release team, I uploaded nano 2.0.1 a while ago to unstable which had minor code changes for the bugs that cropped up in 2.0. Also, there was a number of translation updates. There's a segfault and memleak fixes in CVS that I can apply to 2.0.1 and upload to unstable if there's chances of gett