Hi Thijs,
thanks for you to participate in the discussion. I have seen that you
and Moritz has been the persons who had been active in mantis bug fixing.
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> It makes me somehow angry that i invested so much work in bringing
>> mantis back in a good shape, when people can bl
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 09:49 +0100, "schönfeld / in-medias-res.com"
> wrote:
> > I quiet understand the etch release policy and I am sure that there are
> > cases where 5a matches the case. But in the case of mantis it does *not*
> > match. Because there is currently *one* o
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 09:49 +0100, "schönfeld / in-medias-res.com"
wrote:
> I quiet understand the etch release policy and I am sure that there are
> cases where 5a matches the case. But in the case of mantis it does *not*
> match. Because there is currently *one* open security issue which where
>
dann frazier wrote:
> Package: mantis
> Severity: serious
>
> As per http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt - 5a, I am opening
> this RC bug against mantis to prevent it from releasing until which
> time the security team is convinced that it is a package that can
> be reasonably supported.
>
Package: mantis
Severity: serious
As per http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt - 5a, I am opening
this RC bug against mantis to prevent it from releasing until which
time the security team is convinced that it is a package that can
be reasonably supported.
See the discussion thread here:
5 matches
Mail list logo
