Re: libtre5 transition

2009-12-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, Santiago Vila wrote: The following packages still depend on libtre4, which prevents tre 0.8.0-2 (providing libtre5) from entering testing: crm114 elinks msort Should I report this as a bug, or should I just ask for a binary-only NMU? Ideally, they should use the new API, which means using

libtre5 transition

2009-12-21 Thread Santiago Vila
Hello. The following packages still depend on libtre4, which prevents tre 0.8.0-2 (providing libtre5) from entering testing: crm114 elinks msort Should I report this as a bug, or should I just ask for a binary-only NMU? Ideally, they should use the new API, which means using tre/tre.h instead of