Re: library tranistion proposal exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9

2010-07-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, June 15, 2010 11:39, Mark Purcell wrote: > On Monday 07 June 2010 22:24:17 Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> > A targetted fix for that bug with no ABI change is impossible? >> >> If the primary reason for proposing the transition now is to pull in the >> fix for that bug, then a targetted fix woul

Re: library tranistion proposal exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9

2010-06-15 Thread Mark Purcell
On Monday 07 June 2010 22:24:17 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > A targetted fix for that bug with no ABI change is impossible? > > If the primary reason for proposing the transition now is to pull in the > fix for that bug, then a targetted fix would be much appreciated if > possible (it's one less tra

Re: library tranistion proposal exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9

2010-06-07 Thread Mark Purcell
On Monday 07 June 2010 22:24:17 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > A targetted fix for that bug with no ABI change is impossible? A targeted fix for that bug is possible. > If the primary reason for proposing the transition now is to pull in the > fix for that bug, then a targetted fix would be much appr

Re: library tranistion proposal exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9

2010-06-07 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, June 6, 2010 14:15, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 22:43:24 +1000, Mark Purcell wrote: > >> On Sunday 06 June 2010 22:31:01 Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> > Please don't upload yet. >> > >> > The big issue here is that we can't currently build kdebase-runtime on >> > hppa, due t

Re: library tranistion proposal exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9

2010-06-06 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 22:43:24 +1000, Mark Purcell wrote: > On Sunday 06 June 2010 22:31:01 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Please don't upload yet. > > > > The big issue here is that we can't currently build kdebase-runtime on > > hppa, due to kde4libs FTBFS there (see #561203). > > Adam, > > No

Re: library tranistion proposal exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9

2010-06-06 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sunday 06 June 2010 22:31:01 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Please don't upload yet. > > The big issue here is that we can't currently build kdebase-runtime on > hppa, due to kde4libs FTBFS there (see #561203). Adam, No problem waiting, my motivation is to clear a standing issue with slow writing

Re: library tranistion proposal exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9

2010-06-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 19:28 +1000, Mark Purcell wrote: > On Tuesday 01 June 2010 07:53:23 Mark Purcell wrote: > > The following transition is proposed: > > > > exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9 > > As there don't appear to be any problems/ objections. >From my side, that was partly because

Re: library tranistion proposal exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9

2010-06-06 Thread Mark Purcell
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 07:53:23 Mark Purcell wrote: > The following transition is proposed: > > exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9 As there don't appear to be any problems/ objections. I intend to upload to unstable this week. BinNMU requests to follow. Mark signature.asc Description: T

Re: library tranistion proposal exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9

2010-06-01 Thread David Paleino
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 08:02:29 +0200, David Paleino wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 07:53:23 +1000, Mark Purcell wrote: > > > debian-release, > > > > The following transition is proposed: > > > > exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9 > > > > Important rdepends: > > > > [..] > > + gthumb > > Unfort

Re: library tranistion proposal exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9

2010-06-01 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2010-05-31 Mark Purcell wrote: > debian-release, > The following transition is proposed: > exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9 > Important rdepends: [...] > + hugin > + hugin-tools [...] On a quick test hugin seems to build and run fine with the new libexiv2-9. cu andreas -- To UNSU

Re: library tranistion proposal exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9

2010-06-01 Thread Mark Purcell
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 09:02:56 Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > + rawstudio > > FTBFS - not sure if that is an issue with libexiv, though. Won't have the > time to investigate this week. Bernd, rawstudio built fine here: rawstudio_1.2-5_amd64.deb - new debian package, versio

Re: library tranistion proposal exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9

2010-05-31 Thread David Paleino
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 07:53:23 +1000, Mark Purcell wrote: > debian-release, > > The following transition is proposed: > > exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9 > > Important rdepends: > > [..] > + gthumb Unfortunately, I won't have a decent connection to download all its Build-Depends until fri

Re: library tranistion proposal exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9

2010-05-31 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 05/31/2010 11:53 PM, Mark Purcell wrote: > debian-release, > > The following transition is proposed: > > exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9 > > Important rdepends: > + rawstudio FTBFS - not sure if that is an issue with libexiv, though. Won't have the time to investigate this week. g++

library tranistion proposal exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9

2010-05-31 Thread Mark Purcell
debian-release, The following transition is proposed: exiv2(0.20): libexiv2-6 -> libexiv2-9 Important rdepends: + ufraw + libstreamanalyzer0 + rawstudio + qtpfsgui + python-pyexiv2 + merkaartor + libextractor-plugins + krename + kphotoalbum + libkexiv2-8 + gwenview kdebase-runtime