On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 06:15:23PM -0400, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:23:24PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:55:43PM -0400, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:46:48PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > > > On freed 16 July
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:23:24PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:55:43PM -0400, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:46:48PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > > On freed 16 July 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > > I guess that only a manual build of
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:55:43PM -0400, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:46:48PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > On freed 16 July 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > I guess that only a manual build of a binNMU old scheme on hppa will
> > > > save you from having a source
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:46:48PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On freed 16 July 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > I guess that only a manual build of a binNMU old scheme on hppa will
> > > save you from having a sourceful upload and rebuilds on all
> > > architectures. Probably the hppa buildd
On freed 16 July 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I guess that only a manual build of a binNMU old scheme on hppa will
> > save you from having a sourceful upload and rebuilds on all
> > architectures. Probably the hppa buildd admins (in Cc) can help here?
>
> One issue is that any further updates
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 23:52 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 07/15/2010 10:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:04 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> >> We have run into a problem with libmikmod on stable-security in the most
> >> recent DSA. That was released with the
On 07/16/2010 12:09 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 07/15/2010 11:57 PM, dann frazier wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:52:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> On 07/15/2010 10:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:04 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> We have run into
On 07/15/2010 11:57 PM, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:52:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> On 07/15/2010 10:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:04 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
We have run into a problem with libmikmod on stable-security in t
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:52:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 07/15/2010 10:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:04 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> >> We have run into a problem with libmikmod on stable-security in the most
> >> recent DSA. That was released wi
On 07/15/2010 10:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:04 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> We have run into a problem with libmikmod on stable-security in the most
>> recent DSA. That was released with the version number 3.1.11-a-6+lenny1,
>> following the usual scheme
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:04 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> We have run into a problem with libmikmod on stable-security in the most
> recent DSA. That was released with the version number 3.1.11-a-6+lenny1,
> following the usual scheme. However, as it seems hppa had a version that used
> t
Hi release team,
We have run into a problem with libmikmod on stable-security in the most
recent DSA. That was released with the version number 3.1.11-a-6+lenny1,
following the usual scheme. However, as it seems hppa had a version that used
the old binNMU numbering scheme: 3.1.11-a-6.0.1, which
12 matches
Mail list logo
