Re: libgpod update

2006-11-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
An update to this: On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 04:07:56AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > I would like to update libgpod in unstable. This would include both > a soname change and a -dev package name change. After testing all the reverse dependencies we can probably drop the -dev name change since

Re: libgpod update

2006-10-18 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi Frank, On Tue, Oct 10, 2006, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > I would like to update libgpod in unstable. This would include both > a soname change and a -dev package name change. I /think/ this particular new version would help support newer ipods and/or ipods touched by itunes 7, which w

Re: libgpod update

2006-10-12 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Frank, On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 04:07:56AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > I would like to update libgpod in unstable. This would include both > a soname change and a -dev package name change. Why is this change important to include in the etch release? Why does the -dev package name need t

libgpod update

2006-10-09 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Hi. I would like to update libgpod in unstable. This would include both a soname change and a -dev package name change. Luckily the list of packages affected is pretty small (but the packages on it are somewhat big ;) amarok rhythmbox gtkpod listen (?) -- honestly don't know wether this needs up