On 2004-06-23 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've watched libdv for some time as it is part of the whole gnome2.6
> mess (gst-plugins0.8 depends on it) but I think it just won't go in
> without force.
[more foobar]
This was all just completely wrong, I was too stupid to understand wh
On 2004-06-23 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 06:07:19PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[libdv]
> > # the newer gem in sid is quite broken, FTBFS on multiple archs.
> > remove gem/0.87cvs20031031-3
> I don't remember seeing this one in update_output either; what'
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 06:07:19PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Hello,
> I've watched libdv for some time as it is part of the whole gnome2.6
> mess (gst-plugins0.8 depends on it) but I think it just won't go in
> without force.
> I'd suggest something like this being introduced tomorrow, when
Hello,
I've watched libdv for some time as it is part of the whole gnome2.6
mess (gst-plugins0.8 depends on it) but I think it just won't go in
without force.
I'd suggest something like this being introduced tomorrow, when
kino is 10 day old:
# the newer gem in sid is quite broken, FTBFS on multi
4 matches
Mail list logo
