Re: libburn/libisofs/libisoburn - point release, t-p-u or bpo

2011-06-20 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday, June 18, 2011 10:04:33 PM Gerfried Fuchs wrote: >Hi! Hi, > * George Danchev [2011-06-18 14:45:43 CEST]: > > [libburnia story] > > I can't speak for the stable release team, but I guess they won't > approve the changes you have outlined here. They sound pretty intrusive > and l

Re: libburn/libisofs/libisoburn - point release, t-p-u or bpo

2011-06-18 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi! * George Danchev [2011-06-18 14:45:43 CEST]: > [libburnia story] I can't speak for the stable release team, but I guess they won't approve the changes you have outlined here. They sound pretty intrusive and like complete overhauls to me. Speaking with my backports team hat on, if the c

Re: libburn/libisofs/libisoburn - point release, t-p-u or bpo

2011-06-18 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday, June 18, 2011 03:45:43 PM George Danchev wrote: > Dear Release and Backports teams, To correct my typos, "t-p-u" in the subject to be read as "s-p-u" (stable proposed updates). > Our libburnia packages (src:libburn/libisofs/libisoburn) in squeeze are > rapidly getting way too old as

libburn/libisofs/libisoburn - point release, t-p-u or bpo

2011-06-18 Thread George Danchev
Dear Release and Backports teams, Our libburnia packages (src:libburn/libisofs/libisoburn) in squeeze are rapidly getting way too old as compared to these found in sid and testing. The versions currently found in squeeze do not support JTE (jigdo Template Export), lack quite some other features