Adeodato Simó writes:
> I've scheduled all required Bin-NMUs.
Just FYI, the krb5 rebuild of remctl is currently blocked by #527004 on
php5-dev (phpize needed more updates for libtool 2.x). That bug is
marked as pending, so hopefully new versions of the package will be
available soon.
--
Russ
> "Adeodato" == Adeodato Simó writes:
Adeodato> In that case, would you mind holding off your krb5
Adeodato> upload by, say, a week, as to give a bit of time for
Adeodato> most Bin-NMUs to build against 1.6? I'm happy for this
Adeodato> period to be fixed (one week), instead
+ Sam Hartman (Tue, 05 May 2009 08:31:40 -0400):
> Adeodato> In that case, would you mind holding off your krb5
> Adeodato> upload by, say, a week, as to give a bit of time for
> Adeodato> most Bin-NMUs to build against 1.6? I'm happy for this
> I'm sorry.I ran the dput for the krb5
> "Adeodato" == Adeodato Simó writes:
Adeodato> Aah, there's always a fine print. :-)
Adeodato> In that case, would you mind holding off your krb5
Adeodato> upload by, say, a week, as to give a bit of time for
Adeodato> most Bin-NMUs to build against 1.6? I'm happy for this
+ Sam Hartman (Mon, 04 May 2009 18:30:31 -0400):
> That was the goal, although I'm suspecting that reality will be a bit
> more difficult. Some symbols have had their versions increased in the
> 1.7 packages because new flags were added to the functionality. So,
> it's possible that if some of t
Thanks for all your help!
> "Adeodato" == Adeodato Simó writes:
know when I've uploaded. However,
>> that should not stop you doing bin NMUs. As of
>> 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-9 (-13 is in unstable and testing) packages
>> built against libkrb5-dev will not depend on libkrb53. That
+ Sam Hartman (Mon, 04 May 2009 13:08:34 -0400):
> Adeodato> I say we go ahead without introducing an "oldlibs"
> Adeodato> package, and we Bin-NMU the affected packages. Then, if
> Adeodato> the transition gets very hairy, we'll migrate the new
> Adeodato> libraries to testing but
Adeodato> I say we go ahead without introducing an "oldlibs"
Adeodato> package, and we Bin-NMU the affected packages. Then, if
Adeodato> the transition gets very hairy, we'll migrate the new
Adeodato> libraries to testing but retaining libkrb53 there with
Adeodato> britney, as w
+ Sam Hartman (Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:54:06 -0400):
Hello, Sam, sorry for the delay on getting back to you, and thanks for
coordinating with us.
> Around a month ago, I had discussions of a transition to the krb5
> package on debian-devel. The steps so far have been something that
> hasn't broken a
Around a month ago, I had discussions of a transition to the krb5
package on debian-devel. The steps so far have been something that
hasn't broken anything and I believe has been fairly low impact.
However I'd like the release team's review for the next part and
advice on one of two directions.
10 matches
Mail list logo