Re: krb5 transation: krb5 1.7

2009-05-06 Thread Russ Allbery
Adeodato Simó writes: > I've scheduled all required Bin-NMUs. Just FYI, the krb5 rebuild of remctl is currently blocked by #527004 on php5-dev (phpize needed more updates for libtool 2.x). That bug is marked as pending, so hopefully new versions of the package will be available soon. -- Russ

Re: krb5 transation: krb5 1.7

2009-05-05 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Adeodato" == Adeodato Simó writes: Adeodato> In that case, would you mind holding off your krb5 Adeodato> upload by, say, a week, as to give a bit of time for Adeodato> most Bin-NMUs to build against 1.6? I'm happy for this Adeodato> period to be fixed (one week), instead

Re: krb5 transation: krb5 1.7

2009-05-05 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Sam Hartman (Tue, 05 May 2009 08:31:40 -0400): > Adeodato> In that case, would you mind holding off your krb5 > Adeodato> upload by, say, a week, as to give a bit of time for > Adeodato> most Bin-NMUs to build against 1.6? I'm happy for this > I'm sorry.I ran the dput for the krb5

Re: krb5 transation: krb5 1.7

2009-05-05 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Adeodato" == Adeodato Simó writes: Adeodato> Aah, there's always a fine print. :-) Adeodato> In that case, would you mind holding off your krb5 Adeodato> upload by, say, a week, as to give a bit of time for Adeodato> most Bin-NMUs to build against 1.6? I'm happy for this

Re: krb5 transation: krb5 1.7

2009-05-04 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Sam Hartman (Mon, 04 May 2009 18:30:31 -0400): > That was the goal, although I'm suspecting that reality will be a bit > more difficult. Some symbols have had their versions increased in the > 1.7 packages because new flags were added to the functionality. So, > it's possible that if some of t

Re: krb5 transation: krb5 1.7

2009-05-04 Thread Sam Hartman
Thanks for all your help! > "Adeodato" == Adeodato Simó writes: know when I've uploaded. However, >> that should not stop you doing bin NMUs. As of >> 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-9 (-13 is in unstable and testing) packages >> built against libkrb5-dev will not depend on libkrb53. That

Re: krb5 transation: krb5 1.7

2009-05-04 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Sam Hartman (Mon, 04 May 2009 13:08:34 -0400): > Adeodato> I say we go ahead without introducing an "oldlibs" > Adeodato> package, and we Bin-NMU the affected packages. Then, if > Adeodato> the transition gets very hairy, we'll migrate the new > Adeodato> libraries to testing but

Re: krb5 transation: krb5 1.7

2009-05-04 Thread Sam Hartman
Adeodato> I say we go ahead without introducing an "oldlibs" Adeodato> package, and we Bin-NMU the affected packages. Then, if Adeodato> the transition gets very hairy, we'll migrate the new Adeodato> libraries to testing but retaining libkrb53 there with Adeodato> britney, as w

Re: krb5 transation: krb5 1.7

2009-05-02 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Sam Hartman (Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:54:06 -0400): Hello, Sam, sorry for the delay on getting back to you, and thanks for coordinating with us. > Around a month ago, I had discussions of a transition to the krb5 > package on debian-devel. The steps so far have been something that > hasn't broken a

krb5 transation: krb5 1.7

2009-04-21 Thread Sam Hartman
Around a month ago, I had discussions of a transition to the krb5 package on debian-devel. The steps so far have been something that hasn't broken anything and I believe has been fairly low impact. However I'd like the release team's review for the next part and advice on one of two directions.