Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 06:48:30PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
I have got a request from upstream to change the patch revision
>from 028test007.1 to 028test015. The reason behind this is that
it is "definitly more stable" than
Hi
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 06:48:30PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >I have got a request from upstream to change the patch revision
> >from 028test007.1 to 028test015. The reason behind this is that
> >it is "definitly more stable" than the 028test007.1 version and
>
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
I have got a request from upstream to change the patch revision
from 028test007.1 to 028test015. The reason behind this is that
it is "definitly more stable" than the 028test007.1 version and
have a number of bugfixes corrected.
So I want to ask you if it is ok to upload
Hi
I have got a request from upstream to change the patch revision
from 028test007.1 to 028test015. The reason behind this is that
it is "definitly more stable" than the 028test007.1 version and
have a number of bugfixes corrected.
So I want to ask you if it is ok to upload a new version of this
4 matches
Mail list logo