On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 14:00:33 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:00:53 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> >
> >> Upstream has committed symbol versioning for both the 3.9.x branch and
> >> the trunk (4.0.0) and is prepared to release 3.9.6 and 4.
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:00:53 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
>> Upstream has committed symbol versioning for both the 3.9.x branch and
>> the trunk (4.0.0) and is prepared to release 3.9.6 and 4.0.1 with symbol
>> versioning once we sign off that it's what we're looking
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:00:53 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Upstream has committed symbol versioning for both the 3.9.x branch and
> the trunk (4.0.0) and is prepared to release 3.9.6 and 4.0.1 with symbol
> versioning once we sign off that it's what we're looking for. What's
> the best way t
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 20:46:11 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Much to my surprise, upstream looks like they are going to take it. I
> started a thread on the tiff list today, and one of the primary
> maintainers already introduced a change in their CVS to make this
> possible.
>
Awesome news,
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 19:10:00 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>>
>>> Julien Cristau wrote:
>>>
>>> > As I said previously, if versioned symbols don't happen (in both the old
>>> > and new versions), then the transition is unlikely to happen to
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 19:10:00 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
>> Julien Cristau wrote:
>>
>> > As I said previously, if versioned symbols don't happen (in both the old
>> > and new versions), then the transition is unlikely to happen too. It
>> > was done for png and
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 19:10:00 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > As I said previously, if versioned symbols don't happen (in both the old
> > and new versions), then the transition is unlikely to happen too. It
> > was done for png and jpeg, so it's not like it'd be a
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>> As I said previously, if versioned symbols don't happen (in both the old
>> and new versions), then the transition is unlikely to happen too. It
>> was done for png and jpeg, so it's not like it'd be a first.
>
> I have the skills to do this and understand the concept, b
Julien Cristau wrote:
Okay, I basically have to admit that I agree with everything you said.
>> Proposed new state:
>>
>> * Upgrade the tiff package to 4.0.0-1 and upload to unstable. No other
>>changes would be made to the package.
>>
>> * Create source package tiff3 in section oldlibs a
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 11:38:10 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Here's what I'd like to do with the tiff packages. I believe this will
> be relatively non-disruptive. Technically, I don't think I *have* to
> ask permission for this, but I want to do it as a courtesy to the
> release team, to giv
Here's what I'd like to do with the tiff packages. I believe this will
be relatively non-disruptive. Technically, I don't think I *have* to
ask permission for this, but I want to do it as a courtesy to the
release team, to give you the chance to suggest a different approach or
influence the timin
11 matches
Mail list logo
