Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-05-02 Thread Luk Claes
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 04:56:45PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Sat, April 19, 2008 09:57, Andreas Barth wrote: > > So, the only on-topic question is: Do we want 1.4.9 in Lenny, and I need > > to say that I didn't read any convincing argument for that to happen yet. > > So I don't see release

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-05-02 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hello Laszlo, release team, On Sat, April 19, 2008 09:57, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080419 07:42]: > >> I intend to hijack GnuPG[1], but as it builds an udeb and has priority >> important, I ask if the Release Team allow it. > So, the o

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-04-19 Thread Daniel Leidert
x-post, fup2 debian-devel if possible Am Samstag, den 19.04.2008, 09:57 +0200 schrieb Andreas Barth: > * Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080419 07:42]: > > I intend to hijack GnuPG[1], but as it builds an udeb and has priority > > important, I ask if the Release Team allow

Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-04-19 Thread Andreas Barth
* Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080419 07:42]: > I intend to hijack GnuPG[1], but as it builds an udeb and has priority > important, I ask if the Release Team allow it. I don't think that is at all on-topic on release. The developers guide describes a process how to deal wit

intend to hijack GnuPG

2008-04-18 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
Hi Release Team, I intend to hijack GnuPG[1], but as it builds an udeb and has priority important, I ask if the Release Team allow it. James seems to be MIA more than six months ago: activity-pgp:[Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:02:33] "9BF0 93BC 475B ABF8 B6AE A5F6 D7C3 F131 AB2A 91F5" "&l