Re: ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates

2011-10-20 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 09:16:26PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Thanks, and sorry for all the to-and-fro. > > For the record, 0.14.2 was accepted in to proposed-updates last night. Yes, saw the ACCEPTED in the mail queue. There's nothing to be sorry about, I should have implemented it properly

Re: ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates

2011-10-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 01:05 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 03:16:52PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Unfortunately, after some more detailed review of the diff and some > > testing, I'm afraid we've had to reject the upload, as it stands. > > > > The is

Re: ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates

2011-10-13 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 03:16:52PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Unfortunately, after some more detailed review of the diff and some > testing, I'm afraid we've had to reject the upload, as it stands. > > The issue is the move of the conffile simply using "mv". This leads to > dpkg raising a co

Re: ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates

2011-09-29 Thread Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
2011/9/28 Adam D. Barratt : > Unfortunately, after some more detailed review of the diff and some > testing, I'm afraid we've had to reject the upload, as it stands. > > The issue is the move of the conffile simply using "mv".  This leads to > dpkg raising a conffile change prompt on upgrades even

Re: ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates

2011-09-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 16:39 +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:21:44PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Thanks. > > > > Unfortunately, the version you uploaded appears to have included > > .git, making the diff much larger and noiser than it should be. > >

Re: ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates

2011-08-30 Thread Javier Fern�ndez-Sanguino Pe�a
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:21:44PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Thanks. > > Unfortunately, the version you uploaded appears to have included > .git, making the diff much larger and noiser than it should be. My wrong, sorry, I noticed right after I uploaded it. I've fixed that now. > I've mark

Re: ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates

2011-08-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:22:00 +0200, Javier Fern�ndez-Sanguino Pe�a wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 08:21:46PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 23:25 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > I would like to make an upload to stable in order to fix some bugs in > ifu

Re: ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates

2011-08-30 Thread Javier Fern�ndez-Sanguino Pe�a
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 08:21:46PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 23:25 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > > I would like to make an upload to stable in order to fix some bugs in > > ifupdown-extra which were not detected and fixed in time for the Squeeze > > re

Re: ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates

2011-08-22 Thread Philipp Kern
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 01:40:27AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:09:33AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Assuming that the regular expression change is made in unstable > > _first_, yes that would be fine; thanks. However, it's worth > > bearing in m

Re: ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates

2011-06-21 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:09:33AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Assuming that the regular expression change is made in unstable > _first_, yes that would be fine; thanks. However, it's worth > bearing in mind that the window for acceptance in to the 6.0.2 point > release closes over the coming

Re: ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates

2011-06-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:00:17 +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: 2011/6/13 Adam D. Barratt : On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 23:25 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: The last of the changes in the list above has this changelog entry associated with it: +  * if-up-scripts/static-routes:

Re: ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates

2011-06-16 Thread Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
2011/6/13 Adam D. Barratt : > On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 23:25 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > The last of the changes in the list above has this changelog entry > associated with it: > > +  * if-up-scripts/static-routes: > +      - Fix typo that prevent the script from adding route

Re: ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates

2011-06-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 23:25 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > I would like to make an upload to stable in order to fix some bugs in > ifupdown-extra which were not detected and fixed in time for the Squeeze > release. > > Please find attached the full patch between this new package

ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates

2011-06-12 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
Dear Release Team, I would like to make an upload to stable in order to fix some bugs in ifupdown-extra which were not detected and fixed in time for the Squeeze release. Please find attached the full patch between this new package version and the version 0.14 currently in Squeeze with my propo