Re: hylafax binary package on arm and new upload

At Mon, 11 Apr 2005 04:16:42 +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > > I think hylafax on official arm buildd won't be built soon from observing > > needs-build list. > > Hi Kenshi, > I had a look at the build log and it seems correct. Please proceed with > the upload to unstable. Sure, I did. -- Kenshi

Re: hylafax binary package on arm and new upload

Kenshi Muto wrote: [...] I built hylafax 1:4.2.1-5 on my arm buildd. May I upload this if you want to enter -5 to Sarge sooner, Giuseppe? (http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?&pkg=hylafax&ver=1%3A4.2.1-5&arch=arm&stamp=1113137273&file=log&as=raw) I think hylafax on official arm buildd won't be b

Re: hylafax binary package on arm and new upload

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, At Sun, 10 Apr 2005 11:35:33 +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > I prepared a new version of hylafax that fixes some really small > problems. They are sometimes "cosmetics", like using invoke-rc.d instead > of calling scripts in /etc/init.d. > > The l

hylafax binary package on arm and new upload

Hi all, I prepared a new version of hylafax that fixes some really small problems. They are sometimes "cosmetics", like using invoke-rc.d instead of calling scripts in /etc/init.d. The last upload was about 23 days ago and it is still unbuilt for arm architecture. So I am wondering if I may safely