Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html

2000-05-05 Thread J.A. Bezemer
On Fri, 5 May 2000, David Huggins-Daines wrote: > "J.A. Bezemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > How long will it take to get these things fixed? ("large parts" usually need > > "much time".) This test cycle will only take about 2/3 weeks(??) so you > > might > > not even have things ready by

Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html

2000-05-05 Thread David Huggins-Daines
"J.A. Bezemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How long will it take to get these things fixed? ("large parts" usually need > "much time".) This test cycle will only take about 2/3 weeks(??) so you might > not even have things ready by the end of the cycle. It's already fixed. The reason large par

Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html

2000-05-05 Thread J.A. Bezemer
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 04:23:49PM -0400, David Huggins-Daines wrote: > > Richard, sorry to bother you with this sort of stuff again, but if we > > could make an exception for this, that would be great. > > > > We can't very well test Debian on Alpha

Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html

2000-05-05 Thread Richard Braakman
On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 04:23:49PM -0400, David Huggins-Daines wrote: > Richard, sorry to bother you with this sort of stuff again, but if we > could make an exception for this, that would be great. > > We can't very well test Debian on Alpha if large parts of the system > (basically anything X re