On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 17:07:57 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> On 10/02/2010 07:11 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > I added a removal hint for geany-plugins 0.18 to at least fix that issue
> > for now.
>
> How about letting geany-plugins 0.19 go into Squeeze? It's been sitting
> in Sid for 35 days, a
On 10/02/2010 07:11 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I added a removal hint for geany-plugins 0.18 to at least fix that issue
> for now.
How about letting geany-plugins 0.19 go into Squeeze? It's been sitting
in Sid for 35 days, and the only bug reported since then is "where is
g-p in squeeze?".
Adam
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 14:57:02 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:45:43 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
>
> > the geany-plugins package is a compilation of plugins for the geany IDE.
> > The current version in the archive (0.18) isn't compatible with the
> > geany version (0.
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 18:48 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> On 09/02/2010 03:35 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:37:23 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> >
> >> RT, is this ok for you? Even if it has to go through new?
> >>
> > Sorry for the delay. Are we missing out on a lot if we
On 09/02/2010 03:35 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:37:23 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
>
>> RT, is this ok for you? Even if it has to go through new?
>>
> Sorry for the delay. Are we missing out on a lot if we only ship the
> existing plugins, and not the new ones? If not th
On Sunday 05,September,2010 12:48 AM, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> On 09/02/2010 03:35 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:37:23 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
>>
>>> RT, is this ok for you? Even if it has to go through new?
>>>
>> Sorry for the delay. Are we missing out on a lot if we on
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:37:23 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> RT, is this ok for you? Even if it has to go through new?
>
Sorry for the delay. Are we missing out on a lot if we only ship the
existing plugins, and not the new ones? If not then I think that would
be best for now.
Cheers,
Julien
On 08/22/2010 03:57 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> >From the users point of view, it would be best to upload ctpl (the
>> missing library) and geany-plugins with all the new plugins enabled.
>> However I can understand that you won't like this solution (even if
>> geany-plugins and ctpl are already
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:45:43 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> [ please keep me CC'ed, I'm not subscribed to -release@ ]
>
> Dear RT,
>
> the geany-plugins package is a compilation of plugins for the geany IDE.
> The current version in the archive (0.18) isn't compatible with the
> geany version
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:45:43 +0200
Evgeni Golov wrote:
> [ please keep me CC'ed, I'm not subscribed to -release@ ]
> geany-plugins 0.19 ships 6 new plugins, one of which needs a yet
> unpackaged (in Debian) library.
For Squeeze, I'd recommend simply not packaging the one plugin which
has a depe
[ please keep me CC'ed, I'm not subscribed to -release@ ]
Dear RT,
the geany-plugins package is a compilation of plugins for the geany IDE.
The current version in the archive (0.18) isn't compatible with the
geany version (0.19) in it (the plugins won't load).
A binNMU won't help due to new API
11 matches
Mail list logo
