Re: hint for lxc required

2011-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:21:56 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: On 10/13/2011 12:09 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: It doesn't need a hint, it needs the FTBFS fixing - see https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lxc i already requested the removal of those archs some time ago, see #640351. Inde

Re: hint for lxc required

2011-10-13 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 10/13/2011 12:09 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > It doesn't need a hint, it needs the FTBFS fixing - see > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lxc i already requested the removal of those archs some time ago, see #640351. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Be

Re: hint for lxc required

2011-10-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:59:43 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Hi, > > please add a hint for lxc 0.7.5-3. > No, it doesn't need a hint, it needs to not be out of date on some architectures. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: hint for lxc required

2011-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:59:43 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: please add a hint for lxc 0.7.5-3. It doesn't need a hint, it needs the FTBFS fixing - see https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lxc Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

hint for lxc required

2011-10-13 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi, please add a hint for lxc 0.7.5-3. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-releas