Re: guile-1.8 (1.8.5+1-2) recommended for lenny

2008-08-27 Thread Luk Claes
Rob Browning wrote: > Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> Should I upload a new version that changes the relevant packages to >>> "Architecture: any" or adds ia64 to their Architectures lists, or is >>> that unnecessary/undesirable? >> Yes,

Re: guile-1.8 (1.8.5+1-2) recommended for lenny

2008-08-26 Thread Rob Browning
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Should I upload a new version that changes the relevant packages to >> "Architecture: any" or adds ia64 to their Architectures lists, or is >> that unnecessary/undesirable? > > Yes, you should. OK, thanks. I'v

Re: guile-1.8 (1.8.5+1-2) recommended for lenny

2008-08-24 Thread Luk Claes
Rob Browning wrote: > Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> So Marc, what do you think about this? I'd be tempted to go with the >>> upstream code, and add support ia64, but I could also understand >>> taking the more conservative app

Re: guile-1.8 (1.8.5+1-2) recommended for lenny

2008-08-24 Thread Rob Browning
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> So Marc, what do you think about this? I'd be tempted to go with the >> upstream code, and add support ia64, but I could also understand >> taking the more conservative approach, taking out the patch,

Re: guile-1.8 (1.8.5+1-2) recommended for lenny

2008-08-21 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So Marc, what do you think about this? I'd be tempted to go with the > upstream code, and add support ia64, but I could also understand > taking the more conservative approach, taking out the patch, and > leaving ia64 support for unstable. Nah, let's try

Re: guile-1.8 (1.8.5+1-2) recommended for lenny

2008-08-18 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 16:13 -0600, dann frazier wrote: > fwiw, it builds fine (once the arch list is updated), and my test > builds of a couple guile-1.8 packages seem to build/run fine. As an > ia64 user, I would be happy to have ia64 back in sync with the other > archs here. I agree. It would b

Re: guile-1.8 (1.8.5+1-2) recommended for lenny

2008-08-18 Thread dann frazier
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 06:12:11PM -0700, Rob Browning wrote: > Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hopefully, this should fix the one remaining RC bug for lenny. The > >> other RC bug was fixed by the previous upload (1.8.5+1-1).

Re: guile-1.8 (1.8.5+1-2) recommended for lenny

2008-08-18 Thread Rob Browning
So Marc, what do you think about this? I'd be tempted to go with the upstream code, and add support ia64, but I could also understand taking the more conservative approach, taking out the patch, and leaving ia64 support for unstable. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org;

Re: guile-1.8 (1.8.5+1-2) recommended for lenny

2008-08-14 Thread Neil Jerram
2008/8/14 Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> I just uploaded a new version, 1.8.5+1-3, which I hope will fix the >>> remaining issues. This version may also fix the long-standing >>> problem wit

Re: guile-1.8 (1.8.5+1-2) recommended for lenny

2008-08-13 Thread Rob Browning
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I just uploaded a new version, 1.8.5+1-3, which I hope will fix the >> remaining issues. This version may also fix the long-standing >> problem with support for ia64. > > I'm a bit uneasy about this,

Re: guile-1.8 (1.8.5+1-2) recommended for lenny

2008-08-13 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Hopefully, this should fix the one remaining RC bug for lenny. The >>> other RC bug was fixed by the previous upload (1.8.5+1-1). I believe >>> this releas

Re: guile-1.8 (1.8.5+1-2) recommended for lenny

2008-08-10 Thread Rob Browning
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Hopefully, this should fix the one remaining RC bug for lenny. The >> other RC bug was fixed by the previous upload (1.8.5+1-1). I believe >> this release should be included in lenny, if at all possi

Re: guile-1.8 (1.8.5+1-2) recommended for lenny

2008-08-05 Thread Rob Browning
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Hopefully, this should fix the one remaining RC bug for lenny. The >> other RC bug was fixed by the previous upload (1.8.5+1-1). I believe >> this release should be included in lenny, if at all possi

Re: guile-1.8 (1.8.5+1-2) recommended for lenny

2008-08-04 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hopefully, this should fix the one remaining RC bug for lenny. The > other RC bug was fixed by the previous upload (1.8.5+1-1). I believe > this release should be included in lenny, if at all possible. Unblocked. Marc -- BOFH #317: Internet exceeded L

guile-1.8 (1.8.5+1-2) recommended for lenny

2008-08-03 Thread Rob Browning
Hopefully, this should fix the one remaining RC bug for lenny. The other RC bug was fixed by the previous upload (1.8.5+1-1). I believe this release should be included in lenny, if at all possible. This particular release just includes the two upstream patches from Neil that are listed at the e