Re: gnome-screensaver testing status.

2006-07-04 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 7/4/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:43:15AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > I think gnome-screensaver[0] (28 days old, no RC bugs), is a valid > candidate to enter testing but isn't building on arm yet (unmet deps). > Is it just a matter of reschedule t

Re: gnome-screensaver testing status.

2006-07-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:43:15AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > I think gnome-screensaver[0] (28 days old, no RC bugs), is a valid > candidate to enter testing but isn't building on arm yet (unmet deps). > Is it just a matter of reschedule the build on arm or we've a gnome > lib broken there (i

gnome-screensaver testing status.

2006-06-30 Thread Gustavo Franco
Hi team, I think gnome-screensaver[0] (28 days old, no RC bugs), is a valid candidate to enter testing but isn't building on arm yet (unmet deps). Is it just a matter of reschedule the build on arm or we've a gnome lib broken there (i guess not since nautilus looks good) ? [0] = http://bjorn.hax