Re: glibc: disabling armhf ldconfig support

2012-07-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi, On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:54:27PM -0600, Philipp Kern wrote: > Aurelien, > > thanks for informing us. > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:08:06AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > As a consequence the armhf value will have to be changed in the future, > > which might have some side effects. > >

Re: glibc: disabling armhf ldconfig support

2012-07-05 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:08:06AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >Hi, > >At the end of last year the patch unsubmitted-ldconfig-cache-abi.diff >has been added, but has not been submitted upstream despite asking a few >times. This patch provides correct ldconfig support for systems with >both armel a

Re: glibc: disabling armhf ldconfig support

2012-07-04 Thread Philipp Kern
Aurelien, thanks for informing us. On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:08:06AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > As a consequence the armhf value will have to be changed in the future, > which might have some side effects. What kind of side effects might happen? I.e. is it likely to break pure armhf systems

glibc: disabling armhf ldconfig support

2012-07-04 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi, At the end of last year the patch unsubmitted-ldconfig-cache-abi.diff has been added, but has not been submitted upstream despite asking a few times. This patch provides correct ldconfig support for systems with both armel and armhf libraries. The situation is now that this patch breaks MIPS