Re: gjdoc (0.7.1-2) and javax-servletapi2.3 (4.0-6) to Sarge

2005-03-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 11:05:11PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:02:04 -0800, > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:43:40PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > >> gjdoc (0.7.1-2) is now able to build acceptable javadoc for java libs > >> and j

Re: gjdoc (0.7.1-2) and javax-servletapi2.3 (4.0-6) to Sarge

2005-02-27 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:02:04 -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Arnaud, > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:43:40PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: >> gjdoc (0.7.1-2) is now able to build acceptable javadoc for java libs >> and java apps. Thanks to let it go to Sarge. > >> With this gjdoc,

Re: gjdoc (0.7.1-2) and javax-servletapi2.3 (4.0-6) to Sarge

2005-02-26 Thread Steve Langasek
Arnaud, On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:43:40PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > gjdoc (0.7.1-2) is now able to build acceptable javadoc for java libs > and java apps. Thanks to let it go to Sarge. > With this gjdoc, I've been able to generate the javadoc for package > javax-servletapi2.3 (4.0-6) so RC

gjdoc (0.7.1-2) and javax-servletapi2.3 (4.0-6) to Sarge

2005-02-25 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, gjdoc (0.7.1-2) is now able to build acceptable javadoc for java libs and java apps. Thanks to let it go to Sarge. With this gjdoc, I've been able to generate the javadoc for package javax-servletapi2.3 (4.0-6) so RC Bug #279374 is now closed