Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Hello, On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 16:48:27 -0400, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: > > fex covers *eevvveeerrthng* - right from flipping the > > multiplexing for all 3 SD/MMC cards so that you can pretend that SD0 > > is SD2 and you can specify *different* GPIOs for each to say which > > is > > Yo

Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-05 Thread Tomasz Figa
On Wednesday 05 of June 2013 22:16:37 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:00:13PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > > 2) Having U-Boot itself read a DT and configure itself, just like the > > kernel does. This is relatively new, and only supported by a few > > boards > > (all

Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-05 Thread Tomasz Figa
On Wednesday 05 of June 2013 16:48:27 jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > > wrote: > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > The 3.8.y branch is over, so I think we have to move to 3.9, ready > > > or > > > not. I mer

Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-05 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:00:13PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > 2) Having U-Boot itself read a DT and configure itself, just like the > kernel does. This is relatively new, and only supported by a few boards > (all Tegra to some extent, and a couple each Samsung Exynos and Xilinx > boards). I sus

Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-05 Thread Stephen Warren
On 06/05/2013 02:46 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > mailto:l...@lkcl.net>> wrote: ... > the detect line, which is the write-protect line, to setting the DRAM > clock timings, saying which kernel driver must be loaded to support

Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-05 Thread jonsm...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > The 3.8.y branch is over, so I think we have to move to 3.9, ready or > > not. I merged the work in progress from trunk to sid and am going > > through the config c

Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-05 Thread jonsm...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Ben Hutchings > wrote: > > > The 3.8.y branch is over, so I think we have to move to 3.9, ready or > > not. I merged the work in progress from trunk to sid and am going > > through the config c

Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-05 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[non-debian lists dropped] On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 20:46 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > what's the point of mentioning this? > > well, the point is: the expectation of the linux kernel developers is > that Everyone Must Convert To DeviceTree. [...] > thoughts and discussion appreciate

getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-05 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > The 3.8.y branch is over, so I think we have to move to 3.9, ready or > not. I merged the work in progress from trunk to sid and am going > through the config changes at the moment. > > I'm rather disappointed that nothing at all has been c