Hi folks,
I think debian-release should probably be dropped from the Cc here, since
this is a) a discussion that doesn't involve the release team, and b)
doesn't relate to the question of what needs to be coordinated at the
package level for the upcoming fortran transition.
I don't know about the
On 7/27/07, Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> George N. White III wrote:
>
> > This transition should not be a tied to gfortran and the gcc toolchain.
> > When
> > the code has to change, it should be made to conform to current standards,
> > or in a few years we will doing it all ov
George N. White III wrote:
> This transition should not be a tied to gfortran and the gcc toolchain. When
> the code has to change, it should be made to conform to current standards,
> or in a few years we will doing it all over yet again. One approach would be
> to adopt the POSX Fortran bindin
On 7/26/07, Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/26/07, Christian Holm Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If developers write their `configure' script properly, it shouldn't be
> > too much of a problem. The idea is, check for libraries, adding them to
> > the `LIBS' varia
On 7/26/07, Christian Holm Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If developers write their `configure' script properly, it shouldn't be
too much of a problem. The idea is, check for libraries, adding them to
the `LIBS' variable (AC_CHECK_LIB does that), and at the end you check
for missing fun
Hi all,
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 13:49 -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV wrote:
...
> I've been using this hack for getarg, building it into the base Cernlib
> library "libkernlib" only in the case of compiling with gfortran:
...
> Of course, this won't help your configure script not
Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (22/07/2007):
> The proposal to transition from the outdated g77 to gfortran did not
> result any comments.
> If you have suggestions, critique, or you are busy but accept NMU'ing
> your packages for gfortran transition.. please speak now.
Hi,
I'd like to know th
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 13:49 -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > So it seems getarg, which is needed for mpich, is missing from gfortran,
> > as are other variants used by other fortran compilers. Is there a
> > gfortran equivalent?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Adam
>
> I've b
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> So it seems getarg, which is needed for mpich, is missing from gfortran,
> as are other variants used by other fortran compilers. Is there a
> gfortran equivalent?
>
> Thanks,
> -Adam
I've been using this hack for getarg, building it into the base Cernlib
library "libk
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 01:19 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The proposal to transition from the outdated g77 to gfortran did
> not result any comments. Which rises the suspicion that the maintainers
> of affected packages are not reading debian-release or debian-toolchain.
Indeed, I don't rea
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 01:19:14AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The proposal to transition from the outdated g77 to gfortran did
> not result any comments. Which rises the suspicion that the maintainers
> of affected packages are not reading debian-release or debian-toolchain.
>
> If you h
My fortran packages are non-free (pgplot5) or contrib (ifeffit). I have
not yet had any time to determine if these are going to cause problems. I
am sort of worried though because pgplot5 is quite particular.
Carlo
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Riku Voipio wrote:
Hi,
The proposal to transition f
Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The proposal to transition from the outdated g77 to gfortran did
> not result any comments. Which rises the suspicion that the maintainers
> of affected packages are not reading debian-release or debian-toolchain.
>
I am not a maintainer of any of the affected packa
Hi Riku,
On 7/21/07, Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The proposal to transition from the outdated g77 to gfortran did
not result any comments. Which rises the suspicion that the maintainers
of affected packages are not reading debian-release or debian-toolchain.
If you have suggesti
Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The proposal to transition from the outdated g77 to gfortran did
> not result any comments. Which rises the suspicion that the maintainers
> of affected packages are not reading debian-release or debian-toolchain.
>
> If you have suggestions, critique, or you are busy
Hi,
The proposal to transition from the outdated g77 to gfortran did
not result any comments. Which rises the suspicion that the maintainers
of affected packages are not reading debian-release or debian-toolchain.
If you have suggestions, critique, or you are busy but accept NMU'ing
your packages
16 matches
Mail list logo