freeze exception request for uruk 20100831-1 (was: Re: freeze exception request for uruk 20100823-1)

2010-08-31 Thread Joost van Baal
Hi, Could you please allow uruk 20100831-1 in squeeze? Mehdi Dogguy: thanks for your prompt reply. Op Fri 27 Aug 2010 om 03:15:46 +0200 schreef Mehdi Dogguy: > On 08/27/2010 01:55 PM, Joost van Baal wrote: > > > > Could you please allow uruk 20100823-1 in squeeze? It fixes problems > > with de

Re: freeze exception request for uruk 20100823-1

2010-08-27 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 08/27/2010 01:55 PM, Joost van Baal wrote: > Hi, > > Could you please allow uruk 20100823-1 in squeeze? It fixes problems > with dependency based boot sequencing and has improved support for > IPv6. It was accepted in unstable at Thu, 26 Aug 2010 06:17:07 > +. It is "arch all", so no wai

freeze exception request for uruk 20100823-1

2010-08-27 Thread Joost van Baal
Hi, Could you please allow uruk 20100823-1 in squeeze? It fixes problems with dependency based boot sequencing and has improved support for IPv6. It was accepted in unstable at Thu, 26 Aug 2010 06:17:07 +. It is "arch all", so no waiting for autobuilders is involved. Relevant snippets from