Re: Please unblock foo2zjs_20090908dfsg-5 (was: foo2zjs in squeeze)

2010-11-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 21:25:15 +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > Hi there! > > On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 01:03:14 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 04:31:13 +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > > > >> What should I do? Is it still possible to have a freeze exception for > >> the new upstre

Please unblock foo2zjs_20090908dfsg-5 (was: foo2zjs in squeeze)

2010-11-14 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 01:03:14 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 04:31:13 +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > >> What should I do? Is it still possible to have a freeze exception for >> the new upstream version or should I simply fix #601591 and upload the >> new upstream ve

Re: foo2zjs in squeeze

2010-11-12 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 04:31:13 +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > What should I do? Is it still possible to have a freeze exception for > the new upstream version or should I simply fix #601591 and upload the > new upstream version to experimental (and then backports, once squeeze > is out)? > I'm a

foo2zjs in squeeze

2010-11-04 Thread Luca Capello
Hi there! Please Cc: me, I'm not subscribed to the list. The current foo2zjs package in squeeze (version 20090908dfsg-4) is lagging behind, and I take all the responsibility. Nevertheless, there are two major bugs I would like to solve for squeeze, one being very easy to fix and the other one re