Re: e2fsprogs_1.42.5-1.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-03-24 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
(this should probably move to -devel or somewhere) On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:23:32AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > On 22 March 2013 22:17, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:50:07PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > >> > e2fsprogs (1.42.5-1.1) unstable; urgency=low > >> >

Re: e2fsprogs_1.42.5-1.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-03-23 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:34:31AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > > I'm not sure if the installer team would want to reroll the images or > not, since there is no code changes to the udebs. > But the fix will benefit to be present in the CD's pool to anyone who > upgrades from CDs without intern

Re: e2fsprogs_1.42.5-1.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-03-23 Thread peter green
Ok, I can see how it can be confusing. who-uploads does show that it was my gpg signature on the upload. It's just this way I sponsor any other uploads were the code/changes I am not the author of. IMO there is a big difference between asking someone to sponsor and posting a patch to the BTS. I

Re: e2fsprogs_1.42.5-1.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-03-23 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 22 March 2013 23:26, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:09:44AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: >> >> I was about to file unblock request and ping the installer team coordinators. >> Sorry, if this is the wrong way around with respect to an upload to unstable. > > Well, normally,

Re: e2fsprogs_1.42.5-1.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-03-23 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 22 March 2013 22:17, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:50:07PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: >> > e2fsprogs (1.42.5-1.1) unstable; urgency=low >> >* Non-maintainer upload. >> This shouldn't have been uploaded to unstable without first getting >> permission from the Debia

Re: e2fsprogs_1.42.5-1.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-03-22 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:09:44AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > > I was about to file unblock request and ping the installer team coordinators. > Sorry, if this is the wrong way around with respect to an upload to unstable. Well, normally, I'd ask the Release team first whether they would be

Re: e2fsprogs_1.42.5-1.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-03-22 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:50:07PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > e2fsprogs (1.42.5-1.1) unstable; urgency=low > >* Non-maintainer upload. > This shouldn't have been uploaded to unstable without first getting > permission from the Debian Release team (and preferably me --- it > would have bee

Re: e2fsprogs_1.42.5-1.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-03-20 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:02:55AM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > e2fsprogs (1.42.5-1.1) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Non-maintainer upload. >* e2fsck-static, e2fsprogs: let preinst remove a symbolic link in > /usr/share/doc, that should have been replaced with a directory sin