tags 709492 + wheezy-ignore
tags 709500 + wheezy-ignore
tags 709498 + wheezy-ignore
tags 709497 + wheezy-ignore
tags 709495 + wheezy-ignore
tags 709494 + wheezy-ignore
tags 709491 + wheezy-ignore
tags 708969 + wheezy-ignore
tags 708966 + wheezy-ignore
tags 708956 + wheezy-ignore
tags 708955 + wheez
Hi Niels,
On Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2014, Niels Thykier wrote:
> First, thanks for your hard work on cleaning up the number of RC bugs in
> stable. :)
:-) It aint hard work really, just repeatitive :)
> At first glance, I would say that [1] applies to this question.
> [1] https://lists.debian.
On 2014-02-06 16:18, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it ok to tag all 16 bugs mentioning GFDL issues on
> http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=wheezy&rc=1 with the wheezy-ignore tag?
>
> #708885 is a good example for this class of bugs.
>
> After all, these bugs will be fixed in sid and jes
Hi,
is it ok to tag all 16 bugs mentioning GFDL issues on
http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=wheezy&rc=1 with the wheezy-ignore tag?
#708885 is a good example for this class of bugs.
After all, these bugs will be fixed in sid and jessie and GFDL is perfectly
fine to distribute.
cheers,
4 matches
Mail list logo