Re: ca-certificates version number reuse

2011-09-05 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Sun, September 4, 2011 00:42, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 03:16:20PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >> > You'll need a new DSA mail, though, that's the only "drawback". >> We could upload ca-certificates 20090814+nmu3squeeze1 to ftp-master in >> order to get it into the point up

Re: ca-certificates version number reuse

2011-09-03 Thread Raphael Geissert
[dropping ftpmasters] On Saturday 03 September 2011 17:42:48 Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 03:16:20PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > > You'll need a new DSA mail, though, that's the only "drawback". > > > > We could upload ca-certificates 20090814+nmu3squeeze1 to ftp-master in

Re: ca-certificates version number reuse

2011-09-03 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 03:16:20PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > You'll need a new DSA mail, though, that's the only "drawback". > We could upload ca-certificates 20090814+nmu3squeeze1 to ftp-master in > order to get it into the point update. I'm not sure why we would want to > remove anything

Re: ca-certificates version number reuse

2011-09-03 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Thu, September 1, 2011 22:24, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 01:35:51PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> ftpmasters: we would also need you to remove +nmu3 from the security >> archive, >> wouldn't we? > > You just need to supersede the build with a newer version as Julien said.

Re: ca-certificates version number reuse

2011-09-01 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 01:35:51PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > ftpmasters: we would also need you to remove +nmu3 from the security archive, > wouldn't we? You just need to supersede the build with a newer version as Julien said. It won't be included in the packages file anymore and we coul

Re: ca-certificates version number reuse

2011-09-01 Thread Raphael Geissert
[Re-adding some context for ftpmasters] On Thursday 01 September 2011 01:38:30 Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 07:30:24 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > After the ca-certficates update to stable was installed into the archive, > > it was found out that its version number 20090814+

Re: ca-certificates version number reuse

2011-08-31 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 07:30:24 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Is there somewhere a problem coming from this that we need to resolve, and > if so, how to best resolve it? > It'll never get accepted into the main ftp.d.o archive for inclusion in point releases for new CDs etc. One way to resolv

ca-certificates version number reuse

2011-08-31 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi, After the ca-certficates update to stable was installed into the archive, it was found out that its version number 20090814+nmu3 had already been used in the first upload to unstable after the squeeze release. This is unfortunate, but because the update has already been installed into the secu