On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 05:58:39AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Anyway, ARM is now doing well enough (97% up-to-date and rising) that I'd
> suggest taking it out of the not-keeping-up list.
ARM has other issues that have kept it from meeting the release arch
standards; this will be announced
Steve Langasek wrote:
Thanks for the added info!
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 06:50:50AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> It's a bit soon to declare that there's "no progress" on the hppa bugs, I
> think; AFAIK this bug *was* fixed once (KDE packages were building), and
> then it was somehow reintro
On Sunday, 11 December 2005 21:34, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 06:50:50 -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > Most of the other clusters are tangled up with kde in one way or another
> > (kword, abiword, goffice, and librsvg2 all indirectly depend on libgsf,
> > which makes an
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 06:50:50AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> It really is going pretty well. I see no reason to think that there will
> be any difficulty in finishing both the c2 and the c2a transitions completely
> in etch.
> At this point arm is catching up with its build backlog, but hp
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 06:50:50 -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Most of the other clusters are tangled up with kde in one way or another
> (kword, abiword, goffice, and librsvg2 all indirectly depend on libgsf,
> which makes an unfortunate tangle).
It looks like this can be untangled from KDE in
It really is going pretty well. I see no reason to think that there will
be any difficulty in finishing both the c2 and the c2a transitions completely
in etch.
At this point arm is catching up with its build backlog, but hppa is
dropping fast; HPPA is now doing worse than ARM. HPPA may need to b
6 matches
Mail list logo
