Re: boot-floppies progress

2001-03-22 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would really rather someone fix this, even at the cost of delaying > boot floppies further. 2.2.19pre17 is a significant security upgrade. I'll happily rebuild when those are provided. Be aware that in at least 40% of the cases where there's a n

Re: boot-floppies progress

2001-03-22 Thread Adam Di Carlo
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Woah, that's Really Bad, 2.2.18pre21 has security holes and some nasty > bugs (e.g. MegaRAID incompatibility). What's the problem with pcmcia > modules? There is no package for pcmcia-modules-2.2.19pre17-{compact,idepci} packages. For any kernel to be u

Re: boot-floppies progress

2001-03-21 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:42:35PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > I apologize for my recent lack of involvement in boot-floppies > maintenance. I have been allowing myself the rather guilty pleasure of > working through the new policy of Debian SGML/XML stuff. Which is a > whole lot more fun for

Re: boot-floppies progress

2001-03-21 Thread James Troup
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I apologize for my recent lack of involvement in boot-floppies > maintenance. I have been allowing myself the rather guilty pleasure of > working through the new policy of Debian SGML/XML stuff. Which is a > whole lot more fun for me than boot-floppies

boot-floppies progress

2001-03-21 Thread Adam Di Carlo
I apologize for my recent lack of involvement in boot-floppies maintenance. I have been allowing myself the rather guilty pleasure of working through the new policy of Debian SGML/XML stuff. Which is a whole lot more fun for me than boot-floppies hacking. Anyhow, I'm right now going to tag/relea