Re: boost 1.31 in sarge

2004-08-31 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-08-31 Martin Waitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:30:20AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > No, qt needs to be in sync on all architectures first. Currently, we're > > only waiting on an upload of the m68k build. > Does anyone know what's the matter with the arm bu

Re: boost 1.31 in sarge

2004-08-31 Thread Martin Waitz
hi :) On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:30:20AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > No, qt needs to be in sync on all architectures first. Currently, we're > only waiting on an upload of the m68k build. Does anyone know what's the matter with the arm build? All 3.3 versions failed for various reasons. The b

Re: boost 1.31 in sarge

2004-08-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 12:57:17PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 05:49:22PM +0200, Martin Waitz wrote: > > hi :) > > > > What's the status of boost in sarge? > > It seems that it is blocked by regina-normal's dependency on Qt. > Yep, that's the status. > > Could it be

Re: boost 1.31 in sarge

2004-08-30 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 05:49:22PM +0200, Martin Waitz wrote: > hi :) > > What's the status of boost in sarge? > It seems that it is blocked by regina-normal's dependency on Qt. Yep, that's the status. > Could it be hinted into sarge by the release team or do we have to > wait for Qt to be built