Re: blktrace_1.1.0-2+deb9u1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2018-06-14 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 09:24:30AM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 23:06 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Your package blktrace_1.1.0-2+deb9u1 has been successfully built on > > amd64, however it has been rejected by dak, as you already used the > > _amd64.changes extension for

Re: blktrace_1.1.0-2+deb9u1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2018-06-14 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 09:24:30AM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 23:06 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > Your package blktrace_1.1.0-2+deb9u1 has been successfully built on > > amd64, however it has been rejected by dak, as you already used the > > _amd64.changes extension f

Re: blktrace_1.1.0-2+deb9u1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2018-06-14 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi, On Wed, 2018-06-13 at 23:06 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Your package blktrace_1.1.0-2+deb9u1 has been successfully built on > amd64, however it has been rejected by dak, as you already used the > _amd64.changes extension for the source upload: Ah, that's unfortunate. This probably also e

Re: blktrace_1.1.0-2+deb9u1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2018-06-13 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi, Your package blktrace_1.1.0-2+deb9u1 has been successfully built on amd64, however it has been rejected by dak, as you already used the _amd64.changes extension for the source upload: On 2018-06-13 04:17, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > An exception was raised while processing the package: > T