* Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060616 14:58]:
> Le ven 16 juin 2006 14:34, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
> > > I'll be happy to just filter the page locally
> >
> > In fact I had been doing that for a while, since I like it a bit more
> > compact, and ordered per bug number instead of per package
Le ven 16 juin 2006 14:34, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
> > I'll be happy to just filter the page locally
>
> In fact I had been doing that for a while, since I like it a bit more
> compact, and ordered per bug number instead of per package. In case
> somebody else fancies it like that, these are the on
> I'll be happy to just filter the page locally
In fact I had been doing that for a while, since I like it a bit more
compact, and ordered per bug number instead of per package. In case
somebody else fancies it like that, these are the ones I like to look:
http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/mis
> Now, I have a couple "IMHO suggestions", let's hear what you think; I'm
> not that sure about the first one, but here it goes anyway:
Oh, forgot a nice one:
- change the default for "newer means newer than" from 14 to 7 (as per
the RC 0-day NMU policy).
--
Adeodato Simó
* Steve Langasek [Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:04:56 -0700]:
Hey,
> > - make "etch" and "sid" exclusive, as in, list bugs present _only_ in
> > that distribution.
> I disagree with this. I use the etch view as the (more or less, bugs not
> withstanding) authoritative view of bugs that are blockers
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 02:02:10PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Andreas Barth [Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:50:12 +0200]:
> > there has been a change that affects the number of visible bugs:
> > We treat version tracking correctly now, and ignore the done-status on
> > bugs that have version tracking us
* Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060615 14:01]:
> - make the default dist be "both" instead of "any", so that what
> people get by default is the list of bugs that must be dealt with
> before we can release.
hm, IIRC we had that case before we entered sarge's base-freeze. I
personall
* Thijs Kinkhorst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060615 12:33]:
> Good, thanks for the effort. I have just two queries here: first, since
> Debian seems to rely on this tool for the release process, wouldn't it
> make sense to move it to a debian.org host (release.debian.org comes to
> mind)?
Might be a goo
* Andreas Barth [Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:50:12 +0200]:
> there has been a change that affects the number of visible bugs:
> We treat version tracking correctly now, and ignore the done-status on
> bugs that have version tracking used in a close message.
Cool, thanks.
> For this reason, if you do bug
Hello Andi,
> there has been a change that affects the number of visible bugs:
> We treat version tracking correctly now, and ignore the done-status on
> bugs that have version tracking used in a close message.
Good, thanks for the effort. I have just two queries here: first, since
Debian seems t
10 matches
Mail list logo
