Re: binNMUs for new libgpod

2007-07-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 05:47:15PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:39:06PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > libgpod had a soname change. The following rdepends should probably be > > binNMUed (I've built all of them locally successfully against the new > > version):

Re: binNMUs for new libgpod

2007-07-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:39:06PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > libgpod had a soname change. The following rdepends should probably be > binNMUed (I've built all of them locally successfully against the new > version): [...] > rhythmbox_0.10.1-1, rebuild against libgpod2, 1, alpha amd64 arm hp

Re: binNMUs for new libgpod

2007-07-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:39:06PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > libgpod had a soname change. The following rdepends should probably be > binNMUed (I've built all of them locally successfully against the new > version): > tripod_0.7.0-1, rebuild against libgpod2, 1, alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 i

binNMUs for new libgpod

2007-07-10 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
libgpod had a soname change. The following rdepends should probably be binNMUed (I've built all of them locally successfully against the new version): tripod_0.7.0-1, rebuild against libgpod2, 1, alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips powerpc s390 (has RC bugs and is not in testing, though) rh