Re: binNMUs for gtk-sharp2 2.10.4-2

2008-03-07 Thread Luk Claes
Cyril Brulebois wrote: > On 06/03/2008, Philipp Kern wrote: >> arch:all packages are not autobuilt in Debian, but uploaded with the >> sourceful upload. Thus they are not managed with wanna-build at all. > > How should we proceed in such situations? Open a bug against the > package, so that the m

Re: binNMUs for gtk-sharp2 2.10.4-2

2008-03-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 06/03/2008, Philipp Kern wrote: > arch:all packages are not autobuilt in Debian, but uploaded with the > sourceful upload. Thus they are not managed with wanna-build at all. How should we proceed in such situations? Open a bug against the package, so that the maintainer proceeds with a MU? And

Re: binNMUs for gtk-sharp2 2.10.4-2

2008-03-06 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 12:18:40PM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > > And the packages that depend on libglib2.0-cil (>= 2.10.2) have arch: all > > packages built from the same source which have the same dependency - do > > those packages also need to be rebuilt? If so, these packages need > > sour

Re: binNMUs for gtk-sharp2 2.10.4-2

2008-03-06 Thread Sebastian Dröge
öge wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > could you please schedule binNMUs for gtk-sharp2 2.10.4-2? The previous > > > > one had a broken clilibs control file, resulting in bugs like #468906 > > > > (builds against new version won't work with old version). > &g

Re: binNMUs for gtk-sharp2 2.10.4-2

2008-03-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 11:20:41AM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 04.03.2008, 00:02 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:15:00AM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > > > Hi, > > > could you please schedule binNMUs for gtk-sh

Re: binNMUs for gtk-sharp2 2.10.4-2

2008-03-04 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Am Dienstag, den 04.03.2008, 00:02 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:15:00AM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > > Hi, > > could you please schedule binNMUs for gtk-sharp2 2.10.4-2? The previous > > one had a broken clilibs control file, resulting

Re: binNMUs for gtk-sharp2 2.10.4-2

2008-03-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:15:00AM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > Hi, > could you please schedule binNMUs for gtk-sharp2 2.10.4-2? The previous > one had a broken clilibs control file, resulting in bugs like #468906 > (builds against new version won't work with old version)

binNMUs for gtk-sharp2 2.10.4-2

2008-03-02 Thread Sebastian Dröge
Hi, could you please schedule binNMUs for gtk-sharp2 2.10.4-2? The previous one had a broken clilibs control file, resulting in bugs like #468906 (builds against new version won't work with old version). gnome-sharp2 2.16.1-1 Thanks signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signi