Re: binNMU request: libexiv2-0 => libexiv2-2

2008-02-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 04:07:24PM +0100, Fathi Boudra wrote: > > > exiv2-0.16-1 uploaded today. it's in the NEW queue. > > Ok, sounds good. > exiv2 goes out of NEW some days go and is installed everywhere. > following packages need a binNMU: > ufraw > python-pyexiv2 > libkexiv2-3 > kphotoal

Re: binNMU request: libexiv2-0 => libexiv2-2

2008-02-04 Thread Fathi Boudra
> > exiv2-0.16-1 uploaded today. it's in the NEW queue. > > Ok, sounds good. exiv2 goes out of NEW some days go and is installed everywhere. following packages need a binNMU: ufraw python-pyexiv2 libkexiv2-3 kphotoalbum gwenview gpscorrelate-gui gpscorrelate gimp-ufraw digikam cheers,

Re: binNMU request: libexiv2-0 => libexiv2-2

2008-01-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 12:06:50PM +0100, Fathi Boudra wrote: > > The subject is misleading; you seem to be asking for permission to start a > > transition, not for binNMUs? > yes > > If all of these packages have the same versions in testing and unstable, > > then it should be fine to start the

Re: binNMU request: libexiv2-0 => libexiv2-2

2008-01-26 Thread Fathi Boudra
> The subject is misleading; you seem to be asking for permission to start a > transition, not for binNMUs? yes > If all of these packages have the same versions in testing and unstable, > then it should be fine to start the transition. If some do not, then those > would need closer examination

Re: binNMU request: libexiv2-0 => libexiv2-2

2008-01-17 Thread Paul Wise
On Jan 17, 2008 6:48 PM, Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (oO gcc-4.3?) gcc-4.3 was uploaded to sid recently, and it produces libgcc1, my guess is that gwenview has libgcc1 as a dependency and caught the 4.3 version. Perhaps it would be good if libgcc1 had the new symbols files. --

Re: binNMU request: libexiv2-0 => libexiv2-2

2008-01-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 17/01/2008, Steve Langasek wrote: > If all of these packages have the same versions in testing and > unstable, then it should be fine to start the transition. If some do > not, then those would need closer examination to be sure they aren't > tied to existing transitions. for i in $LIST; do gre

Re: binNMU request: libexiv2-0 => libexiv2-2

2008-01-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:46:59PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I'm not sure whether you can set a Dep-Wait on a package that isn't > uploaded yet, though No, a package needs to be in the needs-build queue to have a dep-wait set. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enoug

Re: binNMU request: libexiv2-0 => libexiv2-2

2008-01-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:15:43PM +0100, Fathi BOUDRA wrote: > after the upcoming upload of exiv2-0.16 The subject is misleading; you seem to be asking for permission to start a transition, not for binNMUs? > , the follwing packages need a binNMU: > ufraw > qtpfsgui > python-pyexiv2 >

Re: binNMU request: libexiv2-0 => libexiv2-2

2008-01-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 16/01/2008, Fathi BOUDRA wrote: > after the upcoming upload of exiv2-0.16, the follwing packages need a > binNMU: > > qtpfsgui In which case, I'd rather do a sourceful upload (1.9.0-2), fixing some bugs (since the testing migration will be stalled). I'm not sure whether you can set a Dep-Wai

binNMU request: libexiv2-0 => libexiv2-2

2008-01-16 Thread Fathi BOUDRA
Hi, after the upcoming upload of exiv2-0.16, the follwing packages need a binNMU: ufraw qtpfsgui python-pyexiv2 libkexiv2-3 kphotoalbum gwenview gpscorrelate-gui gpscorrelate gimp-ufraw digikam Could i upload exiv2 ? cheers, Fathi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE