Re: binNMU for Vim

2006-06-17 Thread James Vega
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 01:56:45AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * James Vega [Sat, 17 Jun 2006 19:03:29 -0400]: > > > Could Vim be queued for a binNMU on all archs to fix bugs 373762, > > 373696, 373890, and 374060. The new ruby1.8 has been uploaded which > > fixes the config errors that were be

Re: binNMU for Vim

2006-06-17 Thread Adeodato Simó
* James Vega [Sat, 17 Jun 2006 19:03:29 -0400]: > Could Vim be queued for a binNMU on all archs to fix bugs 373762, > 373696, 373890, and 374060. The new ruby1.8 has been uploaded which > fixes the config errors that were being seen. Sorry, vim is not binNMU-safe (${Source-Version} used in any -

binNMU for Vim

2006-06-17 Thread James Vega
Could Vim be queued for a binNMU on all archs to fix bugs 373762, 373696, 373890, and 374060. The new ruby1.8 has been uploaded which fixes the config errors that were being seen. Thanks, James -- GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Dig